Research Study2024

There goes the neighborhood? The public safety enhancing effects of a mobile harm reduction intervention.

Fixler, Alex L.; Jacobs, Leah A.; Jones, Daniel B.; Arnold, Aaron; Underwood, Emily E.

SUD/Harm Reduction

Why this matters

Neighborhood opposition is one of the biggest obstacles to siting a mobile addiction clinic, and it usually rests on public safety fears. In Pittsburgh, block groups near four mobile buprenorphine clinics saw total arrests fall 34.1 percent and drug arrests fall 33.9 percent compared with areas more than a mile away.

Authors
Fixler, Alex L.; Jacobs, Leah A.; Jones, Daniel B.; Arnold, Aaron; Underwood, Emily E.
Journal
The International Journal on Drug Policy
Year
2024
Study design
Quasi-Experimental
Setting
Urban
Population
People Who Use Drugs
Outcome domain
Public Safety/Community Impact
Type of organization
Academic

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Buprenorphine is a gold-standard treatment for opioid use disorders, but most people with these disorders do not access it. Barriers to treatment access may be diminished by low-threshold mobile treatment programs but concern regarding their impact on local public safety challenges their adoption. METHODS: This quasi-experimental study uses difference-in-differences analyses to measure the impact of four mobile buprenorphine clinics in Pittsburgh on neighborhood arrest rates. The study period spans 2018 to 2022, with a pre-intervention period of 11 to 12 quarters and a post-intervention period of 7 to 8 quarters (dependent on neighborhood). A treatment group of 84 census block groups in the areas surrounding clinics during the time period after their establishment were compared to a control group of city census blocks not within one mile of a clinic plus treated block groups in the two years prior to clinic establishment. Outcome variables include drug, non-drug, and total arrests, measured quarterly per 100 in population. RESULTS: Compared to block groups further than 1 mile from a clinic, arrests fell by 34.13 % (b = -0.358, 95 % CI = -0.557, -0.158), drug arrests by 33.85 % (b = -0.087, 95 % CI = -0.151, -0.023), and non-drug related arrests by 22.29 % (b = -0.179, 95 % CI = -0.302, -0.057). Drug arrests declined significantly on days when the clinics were not present (b = -0.015, 95 % CI = -0.025, -0.006), with no significant change on clinic operational days (b = -0.002, 95 % CI = -0.016, -0.013). Total arrests declined significantly on days when clinics were and were not present (b = -0.045, 95 % CI = -0.078, -0.012; and b = -0.052, CI = -0.082, -0.023, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Mobile clinics providing medication for opioid use disorders were associated with reduced neighborhood arrest rates. Expansion of mobile services could promote health equity and public safety.

Cite this study:Fixler, Alex L.; Jacobs, Leah A.; Jones, Daniel B.; Arnold, Aaron; Underwood, Emily E. (2024). There goes the neighborhood? The public safety enhancing effects of a mobile harm reduction intervention. The International Journal on Drug Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104329
Metadata curated by Mission Mobile Medical. Full text is available from the publisher via the DOI link above.