Nurse-Led Mobile Clinics to Improve Rural Health Access and Disaster Preparedness: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of a Texas Program.
Kroll, Nicole Peters; Dormire, Sharon L; Wilson, Kelly L
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Rural communities face persistent healthcare barriers related to workforce shortages, geographic isolation, transportation limitations and constrained emergency response capacity. Nurse-led mobile clinics may support healthcare access, continuity of care, and disaster preparedness in underserved settings. This study examined the Texas A&M University (TAMU) nurse-led mobile clinic model with respect to rural service delivery, health equity, operational considerations, and disaster preparedness. METHODS: A mixed-methods descriptive program evaluation was conducted using programmatic operational data, survey responses, and preparedness-planning records. The TAMU mobile clinic serves six rural counties through primary, preventive, and behavioral healthcare delivery using in-person care, telehealth, and home visits. Disaster preparedness activities were integrated through the annual Disaster Day interprofessional simulation involving approximately 600-700 learners. A 2025 Central Texas flooding event served as a case study to evaluate operational preparedness and system readiness. RESULTS: Mobile clinic operations supported healthcare access, continuity of care, and community engagement in rural settings. Interprofessional education simulation findings demonstrated perceived gains in teamwork, triage, communication, and rapid decision-making. During the 2025 flooding event, activation protocols were initiated; however, deployment was not authorized, highlighting system-level constraints related to administrative approval pathways despite operational readiness and workforce preparedness. CONCLUSIONS: Nurse-led mobile clinics may serve as an adaptable infrastructure for improving rural healthcare access, supporting continuity of care, and strengthening disaster preparedness. Findings further emphasize that clinical preparedness alone is insufficient without coordinated administrative processes, interoperable systems, and governance structures capable of supporting rapid emergency deployment.